As a former user of Docusign, one of the features that made it easy to use was that each signer's initials/signatures/inputs were a different color, so it's really hard to make a mistake when selecting where initials go where b/c as an example, one client's inputs show up to me as blue and the other's show up as yellow.
With Digisign, all signers have the same color input. I am working with two buyers whose initial lines show up as NN and KN, and b/c of the way you have to input the initials (it's a click drop down vs. Docusign's select a name from the top of the page), it's very easy to confuse these for me esp. when the names look the same and there's no color difference (and b/c of how you have to select the names for inputs). I think I've had to redo every doc that I couldn't apply a template to b/c I'll have two initial spots for NN --a mistake I never made in Docusign b/c of the color coding.
Created By Amy Butler
RequesterAs a former user of Docusign, one of the features that made it easy to use was that each signer's initials/signatures/inputs were a different color, so it's really hard to make a mistake when selecting where initials go where b/c as an example, one client's inputs show up to me as blue and the other's show up as yellow.
With Digisign, all signers have the same color input. I am working with two buyers whose initial lines show up as NN and KN, and b/c of the way you have to input the initials (it's a click drop down vs. Docusign's select a name from the top of the page), it's very easy to confuse these for me esp. when the names look the same and there's no color difference (and b/c of how you have to select the names for inputs). I think I've had to redo every doc that I couldn't apply a template to b/c I'll have two initial spots for NN --a mistake I never made in Docusign b/c of the color coding.
0 Votes
0 Comments
Login or Sign up to post a comment